The growth in demand and production
of cheap tech. hardware and the widespread availability and use of social media
has spawned a new age of “smart technologies” that are capable of collecting
data about the usage of and interaction with everyday objects, and in turn, can
provide information to us and influence our behavior. The increasing and
perhaps excessive presence of technology in our everyday lives has brought—and
continues to bring—transformation to our society, culture, and our way of life.
To what extent is personal information being collected through technological means—knowingly or not on the user’s end; by whom, and for what reasons? What are the various channels of data collection?
How is technology transforming our society, and how do we know whether it is or will be for “better” or for “worse”?
Whether this change is for better
or for worse may only be determinable in retrospect, for this inquiry is not
just an analysis of past events and their consequences; it is an observation of an ontological shift that has a past, a present, and a future. This future
has yet-to-be seen consequences, good or bad. We cannot determine the future
based solely on the emergence of technology because technology itself is not a “good,” “bad,” or “neutral” thing. It is the consequences, or effects of how humans
use technology that can be perceived as “good” or “bad.” It is human interaction that shapes
this paradigm, and thus human players who mold its future. But
who are these players? It is not exactly the type of thing that is advertised,
rather, it is kept secret. The National Security Agency’s (NSA) invasive spying
practices towards American citizens was not publicly known until Edward
Snowden leaked classified information to the mainstream media. There has since
been a wider debate over government secrecy, mass surveillance, and the balance between national security and information privacy.
As big data and smart technology reshape our society, I ask if is there is a larger, systematic effort aimed at engineering society and applying social and economic policy. How this might affect us? Is it “bad”, or not?
There seems to be a similar pattern to all of
this: the government surveillance, the technological ubiquity, the
various behavioral economic models, the companies profiting from personal data, all stem from a desire to acquire and utilize mass amounts of data;
but at the same time I have to ask whether or not much of this is just
consequence of the technological revolution as it reveals new ways and
understandings of how we interact as human beings. We must consider both subjective and
objective views of humanity, and be willing to ask fundamental questions about
the nature of such.
John, this is a really intense and important topic to research. Have you been able to find any good reliable sources. I know there is a lot of controversy over this topic, but with anything involving government and government surveillance I am curious on how much they sensor the information that is being put out on these topics. I can't wait to read more about your topic!
ReplyDeleteJohn, first I would like to say I really like your writing style! I can't wait to read how this blog unfolds. I am not a conspiracy theorist but this subject is so real and relevant. I hate it how social media can see what it is we look at and then adjust advertisements to suit or consumer "needs". I am just guessing that what the government can do is astounding.
ReplyDelete1